In this exercise I came up with a list of 15 objects, living and nonliving. Then visualized them and tried to see if I could figure out my personal visualization pattern and tendency.
The list:
Dr. Pepper can, car tire, Julia, cup, mom, dishwasher, bed, pillow, dirty clothes hamper, flute, metronome, wallet, calculator, Mitzy (my old cat), Sophia (my roommates dog)
I noticed as I was visualizing that it was harder for me to visualize these objects stationary. Even when I was trying to see them motionless I caught myself viewing them while moving.
After the visualization exercise I answered the following questions.
- Are you better at visualizing people than objects? Or worse?
What seems to be mentally different?
- Are you better at two-dimensional objects than three-dimensional? How so?
- Where do you see your image?
- Is it out in front of your eyes or back in your skull somewhere or somewhere else?
- What is brought to bear in these instances is a keen sensitivity to a non-modular perceptivity of sense-data. Why might this be important in your field?
I am better at visualizing objects than people. When I'm around people I'm more concerned with my interaction with them, rather than the visual presence. Therefore I find it more difficult to recall the details of the person's appearance.
All of the objects I chose where 3D but when i did visualize a 2D object I didn't really notice a difference.
I see my image in the same setting that I see it everyday. If it was a cup I saw it on a table, if it was a tire I saw it on my car.
Most of the time the image that I came up with was in front of me almost as if I could reach in and interact with the picture, again always in the same setting that I always see it, from the same angle I always see.
Art is sensual. It is important as an artist to use ones own senses to figure out how to express the senses through their work.